حيث ان البينة التي تقدمت بها الجهة

حيث ان البينة التي تقدمت بها الجهة المدعي عليها لم تشر إلى ماهية الاشغال التي اشارت إليها المادة (52/4) من قانون المدن و القرى ، فيكون ما قامت به الجهة المدعي عليها من فرض عوائد تنظيم خاصة على عقار مدني لا سند له من الواقع و القانون و غير ملزمة للمدعيين و ان اي اتفاق بهذا الخصوص معهما غير ملزم لهما

Results (English) 1:

Where the evidence submitted by the respondent did not indicate what the works cited section (52/4) of the towns and villages, it is done by the respondent from imposing special planning property returns a civilian has no basis of fact and law and not binding on the plaintiffs and that any agreement to this effect with their non-binding

Results (English) 2:

Where the evidence submitted by the Respondent did not indicate the nature of the works referred to by Article (52/4) of the Law of cities and villages, so what was done by the prosecutor from the imposition of a private organization returns to civilian property was not supported by reality and law and is binding on prosecutors and that any agreement to this effect with them a non-binding for them