من الصعب أن يتم مقارنة الاقتصاد الن

من الصعب أن يتم مقارنة الاقتصاد النفطى النرويجى مع الاقتصاد الخليجى حتى فى الفترات الأولى لإستغلال النفط حين كانت دول الخليج تعاني حتى أوائل السبعينيات الفقر والتخلف كانت النرويج آنذاك متطورة وذات اقتصاد متنوع مع نسبة من السكان المتعلمين تعليماً عالياً ويتمتعون بالتوظيف الكامل وبمستوى عال من المعيشة. والنرويج قبل النفط كان لديها إقتصاد قوى قائم على الخدمات وبناء السفن . صحيح أن ظهور النفط فى دول الخليج كان فرصة للقفز في سنوات قليلة مراحل من التطور يمكن أن تستغرق أجيالاً في ظروف أخرى وبخاصة في قطاعي التعليم والصحة ، لكن لا تقارن بالنرويج التى لم تمثل عوائد النفط رافداً للقاعدة الاقتصادية الضخمه فحسب بل داعمةً أيضاً لنشاطات إقتصادية مستقرة .
فصناعة النفط فى الخليج بدأت بزيادة التكلفة المحلية مما هدد التوظيف المحلى وازدياد الحاجة إلى التنويع في سبيل التوظيف فى ظل خدمات النفط وصناعات التوريد المتعلقة بالنفط والغاز الطبيعي.مما اسهم فى ازدياد العمالة الماهرة الوافده ، ورغم تتباين حالة التوظيف في دول الخليج فبعضها يتكل اتكالاً شديداً على اليد العاملة الأجنبية في الأعمال اليدوية لأن اليد العاملة المحلية مكلفة جداً ولدى دول الخليج الأخرى ومنها المملكة العربية السعودية مشكلة توظيف تنتشر على الأخص بين الشباب والحاجة فيها ملحة إلى خلق المزيد من فرص العمل وبقدر ما تحتاج صناعة النفط المحلية إلى الصناعة والتجديد وبالتالي إلى توسيع الطاقة الإنتاجية القصوى.
فى دول الخليج كان الهدف بشكل أساسي هو توزيع عوائد النفط دون النظر إلى البحث عن تنويع الإنتاج المحلى مما يؤدى ذلك من الاعتماد على عوائد النفط وما يترتب عليها من مخاطر اقتصادية واجتماعية عالية . وخاصة أن السكان فى إذدياد مع الاعتماد على السلع والخدمات المستورده دون أى اتجاه لتتنويع الصادرات مما يشتد الضغط لتنوع قاعدة الدخل وفرص التوظيف من دون قيام الدولة بضمان قاعدة أوسع للدخل سيكون الأمل في استخدام عوائد النفط بشكل غير مباشر ضئيلاً وهنا يمكن الخطر المتعاظم للفجوات في التطور الاقتصادي والاجتماعي.
الحديث عن أن النرويج ذات نظام ملكي مثل دول الخليج ولكنها فى الواقع تتسم بطابع آخر فالدور التقليدي للدولة في النرويج هو إعادة توزيع المال وفرض الضرائب على المداخيل والمبيعات والممتلكات ليعاد تخصيصها من قبل برلمان منتخب ديمقراطياً وعلى الرغم من أن عوائد النفط للنرويج مرتفعة فإن هذا لم يحدث أي تبدل في الوظيفة الأساسية للدولة وفي الواقع أمكن من خلال المحافظة على فرض الضرائب على المواطنين إنشاء " صندوق النفط" واستخدام العوائد النفطية بشكل غير مباشر.
لا نعتقد أن شرط التحول الديمقراطى بالمفهوم الغربى فى النرويج لابد منه فى اصلاح الاقتصاد الخليجى . ولكن الاسلام لديه تجربة ناجحة فى الحكم وإدارة الاقتصاد ، من خلال الشورى وإشراك الرأى المجتمعى فى إدارة الدولة والاقتصاد ، والاعتماد على التخصص وتقسيم العمل . وكذلك الاهتمام بالخبراء الوطنيين فى ايجاد المعالجات للاقتصاد الخليجى من دون الحديث عن ديمقراطية الغرب الزائفه . كما أن فرض الضرائب ليس حلاً لعلاج الاقتصاد فى الدول المسلمة وإنما إعمار الأرض وتنويع الاقتصاد من سلع وخدمات لتغطية الطلب المحلى بهدف الاعتماد على الذات ، وتوفير سلع محلية للتصدير تسند سلعة النفط تحد من اثر تقلبات الاقتصاد العالمى على الدولة المعتمده على السلع الواحده كما هو الحال فى دول الخليج . كما أنه ليس هنالك اختلاف كثير فى دول الخليج فيما يتعلق بممارسة النرويج السلطة والسيطرة على قاعدة ملكية الموارد الطبيعية ، والتعامل مع القضايا الإستراتيجية والهيكلية .

Results (English) 1:

It's hard to Norwegian oil economy is compared with the Gulf economy even in the first periods of oil exploitation while Gulf countries suffer until the early 1970s, poverty and underdevelopment were advanced and then Norway with a diversified economy with a highly educated population and enjoyed full employment and a high standard of living. And Norway before oil had a strong economy based on services and shipbuilding. It is true that oil in the Gulf was an opportunity to jump in a few years the stages of development can last generations in other circumstances, particularly in the education and health sectors, but don't compare to Norway yet oil revenues supplementing the huge economic base but also supportive of stable economic activities. Oil industry in the Gulf began to increase local cost threatening local recruitment and increased need for diversification employment under the oil supply industries and services related to oil and natural gas which contributed to increasing skilled labor, while varying the staffing situation in the Gulf some severely dependent relies on foreign labor in crafts that local labour too expensive in other Gulf countries including Saudi Arabia recruitment problem spread especially among young people and the need to create More jobs and as much as you need the local oil industry to industry and innovation and thus to expand production capacity. In the Gulf States aim was basically to distribute oil revenue without regard to the search for diversification of domestic production resulting from dependence on oil revenues and consequent high social and economic risks. Especially to people in azediad with dependence on imported goods and services without any direction lettnoia exports than pressure to diversify income and employment base of the State to ensure a broader base of income will hope to use oil revenues indirectly low here, the growing danger of gaps in economic and social development. Talk to Norway with a monarchy like the Gulf States but it is in fact another character, the traditional role of the State in Norway is redistributing money and impose taxes on income, sales and property to be reassigned by the democratically elected Parliament and although Norway's oil revenues are high that no change in the basic function of the State and indeed possible by maintaining a taxation of citizens created "oil fund" and use oil revenues indirectly. I don't believe that the requirement of democratic transformation in the Western concept in Norway must, in reforming the economy. But Islam has successful experience in governance and management of the economy, through consultation and involvement of community opinion in State administration and economy, relying on specialization and Division of labor. And national experts in finding treatments for Gulf economy without talking about democracy of the West. As taxation is not a solution to cure the economy in Muslim countries but populate the Earth and diversify the economy of goods and services to cover domestic demand to self reliance, and provide local commodities for export oil commodity assigned limit the impact of fluctuations in the world economy-dependent per State as in the Gulf States. As there is no difference in the Gulf States with regard to the exercise of power and control over Norway base of ownership of natural resources, and dealing with strategic issues and structural.

Results (English) 2:

It 's hard to be compared to the Norwegian oil economy with the Gulf economy , even in the early days of the oil exploitation while the Gulf states to suffer until the early seventies poverty and underdevelopment Norway was then advanced with a diversified economy with a ratio of the highly educated population and enjoyed full employment and a high level of living. Norway 's oil before it had a strong economy based on services and shipbuilding. It is true that the discovery of oil in the Gulf states had a chance to jump in a few years later stages of development that can take generations , in other circumstances, particularly in the sectors of education and health, but it does not compare to Norway , which did not represent oil revenues tributary of the economic base of the huge but supportive also of the activities of economic stable.
oil industry in the Gulf began to increase local cost than local employment threatened and the increased need for diversification for the sake of employment under the oil - services and industries the supply of oil and gas Tabiei.mma contributed to the increase in skilled foreign workers, despite the varied employment in the Gulf state . Some trusts heavily reliant on foreign labor in the handicraft business because the local labor is very expensive and the other Gulf countries, including Saudi Arabia , the problem of employing spread particularly among young people and the need for the urgent creation of more jobs and as much as you need the local oil industry to industry and innovation and thus to expand production capacity maximum.
in the Gulf states the goal is essentially the distribution of oil revenues , without regard to the search for diversification of domestic production resulting from reliance on oil revenues and the consequent high economic and social risks. Especially that the population is increasing . With dependence on goods and services imported without any direction to Ttnoaa exports , which intensifies the pressure to the diversity of the income base and employment opportunities without the establishment of the state to ensure a broader base of income will hope to use oil revenues indirectly little here can the growing threat of the gaps in economic development and social development .
talk about that Norway with a monarchy such as the Gulf states but in reality nature Last the role of the traditional state in Norway is the redistribution of money and the imposition of taxes on income, sales and property to be re - allocated by the democratically elected parliament and despite the fact that oil revenues for Norway is high, this There has been no change in the basic function of the state and in fact possible by maintaining a tax citizens create the "oil fund" and the use of oil revenues indirectly.
we do not think that the democratic transition clause Western sense in Norway inevitable in the reform of the Gulf economy. But Islam has a successful experience in governance and management of the economy, through consultation and involvement of societal opinion in the state administration and the economy, relying on specialization and division of labor. As well as attention to national experts in finding treatments for Gulf economy without talking about the West pseudo - democracy. The tax is not a solution for the treatment of the economy in Muslim countries, but the reconstruction of the land and diversify the economy of goods and services to cover domestic demand , with the aim of self - reliance, and the provision of local goods for export assigned oil commodity limit the impact of fluctuations in the global economy over the approved State on goods one o'clock , as is the case in Gulf countries . As it is, there 's not much difference in the Gulf states regarding the exercise of Norway power and control over the ownership of the natural resource base, and to deal with the strategic and structural issues.

Results (English) 3:

It is difficult to be compared with the Norwegian oil economy with the Gulf economy even in the periods of the first to use the oil until early seventies when Gulf States suffer poverty and underdevelopment were Norway at the time, sophisticated and diversified economy with the proportion of highly educated and have full employment and a high level of living. Norway before the oil had strong economy is based on services, and ship building. It is true that the appearance of oil in the Gulf States had the chance to jump in a few years, stages of development can last for generations in other conditions, especially in the education and health sectors. But don"t compare to Norway, which did not represent the proceeds of oil is great huge economic base, but also supportive of economic activity stabilized.The manufacture of the oil in the Gulf began to increase the local cost which threatened the local employment and the increasing need for diversity in employment in the oil supply and oil and gas services the normal, which contributed to higher skilled workers Alwafdh, while varying the staffing situation in the Gulf States, some are highly dependent on foreign labor in manual because the local labor very expensive in other Gulf States, United LKH Saudi youth employment problem is particularly urgent and need to create more jobs, the domestic oil industry and the need of industry and innovation therefore, to expand production capacity limit.In the Gulf, the object mainly is the allocation of oil revenues, without regard to the research on the diversification of the local production resulting from reliance on oil revenue and the effect of high economic and social risks. In particular, the population in the Adhdyad relying on imported goods and services without any trend of exports than pressure of a Lttnwy income and employment opportunities, without a state to ensure a broader base of income will be little hope in the use of oil revenues directly here, the growing threat of gaps in economic and social development.Talk to Norway with the monarch, such as the Gulf States. Rather, they were the last traditional role of the state in Norway is the reallocation of capital and taxation income, sales, and property to be allocated by the democratically elected parliament, while Norway"s oil revenues are high, that there has been no change in the basic state function in fact the province oil "to tax the citizens" Pool Spa Tkhdam indirect oil revenue.We do not believe that a democratic transition in the western Norway. The Gulf economy reform imperative. But Islam has successful experience in the governance and economic management through consultation. The community involvement in the management of the state and the economy, and specialization and division of labor. As well as the focus of national experts to find treatments for Gulf without talking about the democracy of the West Alzayfh. The tax is not a solution for the economy in Muslim countries, but the reconstruction of the earth and the diversification of the economy of goods and services to meet the domestic demand in order to self-reliance, Photoshop