و اما قولها بأن وكيل المدعين اقر بر

و اما قولها بأن وكيل المدعين اقر برضى موكليه بالسعر فغير صحيح، فمطالبة موكلي بعوائد الاستثمار وفقًا للسعر الذي تم به البيع لا يعني رضى موكلي به او اقرارًا بأنه هو القيمة العادلة، بل كانت المطالبة وفقًا لذلك السعر؛ لانه هو السعر الذي وقع عليه البيع و لا يعد ذلك تنازلا من موكلي بالمطالبة بالقيمة العادلة لو ثبت ان المدعي عليها تصرفت بالبيع بأقل من ثمن المثل

Results (English) 1:

And either saying that the agent acknowledged the plaintiffs satisfied clients, price is incorrect, claim my clients with investment returns according to the sale price does not mean my client satisfaction or recognition that is fair value, but the claim that price because it is the price of sale and is not a waiver of my clients claim at fair value if it is proved that the defendant acted with a sale for less than the price of similarly

Results (English) 2:

And either saying that the agent plaintiffs acknowledged the consent of his clients the price is not correct,'s claim to my client returns on investment, according to the price that has been its sale does not mean the satisfaction of my clients do or an admission that it is a fair value, but the claim is in accordance with that price; for it is the price which was signed by sales and this is not a waiver of my client claim at fair value if it is proven that the prosecutor acted to sell them for less than the price of ideals

Results (English) 3:

But prosecutors say that agent admitted the satisfaction of the client, the price is right, by requesting the client, investment earnings, according to the price, have been sold does not mean the satisfaction of my clients. Or Aqrarana is fair value, it was claimed that because he accordingly price;The price for sale, this is not a waiver by my client to claim at fair value if it were shown that the respondent did sell for less than $one eighth.