في الواقع تصرفات ترامب (و قبل نايجل

في الواقع تصرفات ترامب (و قبل نايجل) لم تكن اعتباطية، و حملاته التي اعتبرت الاقل مستوى و الاضعف اقناعًا و الاكثر اخطاءً في تاريخ الحملات الامريكية لم تقلل من حظوظه؛ بل كانت ردود الافعال من قبل الاعلام و استطلاعات الرأي و فريق كلينتون يعززون من فرص ترامب في الفوز من حيث لا يدرون

Results (English) 1:

In fact, Trump's actions (and by Nigel) were not arbitrary, and campaigns that were deemed least feebler and persuasive and most level errors in the history of u.s. campaigns didn't diminish his fortunes; the reactions by the media and public opinion polls and Clinton's team enhances the chances of Trump win in terms of uncertainty

Results (English) 2:

In fact the actions of Trump (and before Nigel) were not arbitrary, and campaigns that were considered at least the level and the weakest convincing and the most errors in the history of US campaigns did not reduce its chances; it was a reaction by the media and opinion polls and Clinton's team reinforce the chances of Trump to win in terms of do not know

Results (English) 3:

In fact, the actions of trump) and Nigel were not arbitrary, and his campaigns that were considered to be at least level and Aqnaana weaker and more Akhtaan campaigns in history. The U.S. did not reduce his chances, but reactions from the media and opinion polls, Clinton group, enhance the chances of winning trump in La know